http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:49:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-128 s Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:32:11 +0000 http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-128 ha a szabvanynak van tulajdonosa, akkor ez valahol egy monopolhelyzetet is teremt. tovabba, bar a pozitivumai a Cost+ arazasnak vannak pozitivumai. A negativumait ne feledjuk [copyfromwikipedia]:<br> 1. provides no incentive for efficiency<br> 2. tends to ignore the role of consumers<br> 3. tends to ignore the role of competitors<br> 4. use of historical accounting costs rather than replacement value<br> 5. use of “normal” or “standard” output level to allocate fixed costs<br> 6. inclusion of sunk costs rather than just using incremental costs<br> 7. ignores opportunity costs<br> 8. contractors may not focus on performance because the cost is always covered by the client ha a szabvanynak van tulajdonosa, akkor ez valahol egy monopolhelyzetet is teremt. tovabba, bar a pozitivumai a Cost+ arazasnak vannak pozitivumai. A negativumait ne feledjuk [copyfromwikipedia]:
1. provides no incentive for efficiency
2. tends to ignore the role of consumers
3. tends to ignore the role of competitors
4. use of historical accounting costs rather than replacement value
5. use of “normal” or “standard” output level to allocate fixed costs
6. inclusion of sunk costs rather than just using incremental costs
7. ignores opportunity costs
8. contractors may not focus on performance because the cost is always covered by the client

]]> http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-98 s Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:32:11 +0000 http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-98 ha a szabvanynak van tulajdonosa, akkor ez valahol egy monopolhelyzetet is teremt. tovabba, bar a pozitivumai a Cost+ arazasnak vannak pozitivumai. A negativumait ne feledjuk [copyfromwikipedia]:<br> 1. provides no incentive for efficiency<br> 2. tends to ignore the role of consumers<br> 3. tends to ignore the role of competitors<br> 4. use of historical accounting costs rather than replacement value<br> 5. use of “normal” or “standard” output level to allocate fixed costs<br> 6. inclusion of sunk costs rather than just using incremental costs<br> 7. ignores opportunity costs<br> 8. contractors may not focus on performance because the cost is always covered by the client ha a szabvanynak van tulajdonosa, akkor ez valahol egy monopolhelyzetet is teremt. tovabba, bar a pozitivumai a Cost+ arazasnak vannak pozitivumai. A negativumait ne feledjuk [copyfromwikipedia]:
1. provides no incentive for efficiency
2. tends to ignore the role of consumers
3. tends to ignore the role of competitors
4. use of historical accounting costs rather than replacement value
5. use of “normal” or “standard” output level to allocate fixed costs
6. inclusion of sunk costs rather than just using incremental costs
7. ignores opportunity costs
8. contractors may not focus on performance because the cost is always covered by the client

]]> http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-76 Az 5 és csak 5 nyílt szabvány követelmény : vissza a jövőbe Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:07:59 +0000 http://visszaajovo.be/mazsa/open-market#comment-76 [...] Open Market [...] [...] Open Market [...]

]]>